← Library
Madras High CourtA/2270/2024closed

Mrs.Rajalakshmi Selvarangan v. Ms.S.Sahana

2024-06-07Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan3 pages

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

On 30.04.2024, this Court had directed that the 5th respondent may purchase a Demand Draft for a sum of Rs.9,00,000/- towards GST and handover that particular Demand Draft to the plaintiff and also pay a sum of Rs.6,00,000/- to the credit of PAN No. AAVPS8633G in the name of the plaintiff and also deposit a sum of Rs.3,50,000/- towards rental arrears.

2.

It is now contended on behalf of the 5th respondent that an amount of Rs.6,94,000/- has been paid to the credit of aforementioned PAN number which is the amount to be paid towards Tax Deduction at source.

3.

So far as the GST payment is concerned, it is contended that the plaintiff should forward the GST Number and only thereafter it can be paid. That payment can be done independent of the Court and the plaintiff and the 5th respondent may enter into a separate communication regarding payment of GST and the Court need not be burdened regarding

that particular aspect.

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

Gsa 4.

So far as the rental arrears are concerned, according to the learned counsel for the respondents, they are ready to pay a sum of Rs.2,62,778/- and a Demand Draft for the same had been purchased. Let that Demand Draft be deposited into the Court. Since there has been an effective compliance of the requirements of the plaintiff, both these Applications stands closed. If there is any further claim towards rental arrears, the plaintiff may initiate separate proceedings or claim it independent of this particular suit against the 5th respondent. 07.06.2024 gsa (1/4) in C.S.No.31 of 2022