Vinoth @ Vinothkumar v. The State Represented By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 25.06.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.9311 of 2020

1. Vinoth @ Vinothkumar S/o. Jaganathan, Thachur Village, Arani Circle, Tiruvannamalai District.

2. Maha @ Mahalingam, S/o. Murugan, Thachur Village, Arani Circle, Tiruvannamalai District.

... Petitioners Vs.

State Rep. by The Sub Inspector of Police, Chetpet Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.

Cr. No.700 of 2020 ... Respondent Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.700 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioners : Mr. B.S.Manikandan For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 379 and 430 IPC read with 21(5) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.700 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioners/A1 and A2 are alleged to have transported 1 1⁄2 units of river sand illegally in the vehicle bearing Registration No.TN 23 Y 7877. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they did not commit any offence as alleged. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioners have transported 1 1⁄2 units of river sand illegally in the vehicle. He further submitted that there are two previous cases pending against the petitioners.

5. This Court is of the opinion that the petitioners are directed to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) as non-refundable deposit jointly to the credit of the Cancer Institute (WIA), East Canal Bank Road, Adyar, Chennai, without prejudice to their rights and contentions before the trial Court. Merely, because the petitioners have deposited the said amount, it would not amount to admission of their guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently.

6.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to deposit jointly a sum of Rs.25,000/- each (Rupees twenty five thousand only) as non-

refundable deposit to the credit of the Cancer Institute (WIA), East Canal Bank Road, Adyar, Chennai within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready and on such deposit the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Polur, Tiruvannamalai District, on condition that each of the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- each (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioners shall deposit jointly a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) to the credit of the Cancer Institute (WIA), East Canal Bank Road, Adyar, Chennai and shall produce the

said receipt before the Court below.

[c] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

[d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

25.06.2020 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking order kal

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J kal To

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Polur, Tiruvannamalai District,

2. The Sub Inspector of Police, Chetpet Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

Crl.O.P.No.9311 of 2020 25.06.2020