Narasimman v. The State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 26.06.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

1. Narasimman S/o.Kedasengamma Naidu, R.K.Pettai, V.Pudur, Pallipettai Taluk, Thiruvallur District. Tamil Nadu.

2. Venkatesan S/o.Kathavarayan No.61, New No.55, Paivalasa, Pallipattu, Thiruvallur District.

3. Ramalingam S/o.Govindaraju Reddy Kattarikuppam, Paivalasa, Pallipattu Thiruvallur District.

... Petitioners Vs.

State Rep. by Station House Officer, R.K.Pet Police Station, R.K.Pet Taluk, Thiruvallur District, Tamil Nadu.

Cr. No.1339 of 2020 ... Respondent 1/6

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No.1339 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.P.R.Thirunellakandan For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 430 and 379 of IPC and Section 21(1) of Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act 1957 in Crime No.1339 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioners are alleged to have transported one unit of sand illegally. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are an innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 2/6

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioners transported one unit of sand illegaly in a tractor. He further submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioners.

5. This Court is of the opinion that the petitioners are directed to deposit a sum of Rs.15,000/- jointly (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) as non refundable deposit to the credit of the Cancer Institute (WIA), (Regional Cancer Centre), Adyar, Chennai 600 020 without prejudice to their rights and contentions before the trial Court. Merely, because the petitioners have deposited the said amount, it would not amount to admission of his guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently.

6. Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to deposit a sum of Rs.15,000/- jointly (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) as non refundable deposit to the credit of Cancer Institute (WIA), (Regional Cancer Centre), Adyar, Chennai 600 020 within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready and on such deposit the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of 3/6

arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pallipet on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- each (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.15,000/- jointly (Rupees Fifteen thousand only) to the credit of the Cancer Institute (WIA), (Regional Cancer Centre), Adyar, Chennai 600 020 and shall produce the said receipt before the Court below.

[c] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

4/6

[d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

26.06.2020 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking order dpq 5/6

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J dpq To

1. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Pallipet.

2. The Station House Officer, R.K.Pet Police Station, R.K.Pet Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

Tamil Nadu.

3. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

26.06.2020 6/6