P.Manoharan, v. The Commissioner Of

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.10.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.13886 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 P. Manoharan ... Petitioner Vs.

The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

... Respondent Prayer:

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction in the nature of a writ calling for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in Roc.No.14625/F1/2014 dated 15.05.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with all monetary and other attendant benefits.

For Petitioner :

No appearance For Respondent :

Mrs.K.Bhuvaneshwari Government Advocate

O R D E R

When the matter was listed for hearing on 10.10.2017, there was no representation on behalf of the writ petitioner. Thus, it was once again posted today under the caption "For dismissal" and today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

2. Thus, the Writ petition stands dismissed for nonprosecution. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar rpl https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

W.P.No.13886 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 T.R (10/11/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/