Ganesan v. The State, Represented By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.06.2020

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.9441 of 2020 Ganesan ... Petitioner Vs.

State Reptd. by Inspector of Police AWPS, Mettur, Salem District.

Crime No.2 of 2017 ... Respondent PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition filed under section 439 of Cr.P.C., seeking to enlarge the petitioner on bail in respect of the above Crime No.2 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Manual For Respondent : Mr.K.Prabakar Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

(The case has been heard through video conference) The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the Trial Court has granted bail. Meanwhile, due to miscommunication between the lower Court counsel and the petitioner, this petition has been filed. Hence, he seeks to withdraw the present Petition.

2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the present Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

-sd/- 25/06/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE STATE, REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AWPS, METTUR, SALEM DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S. D.MANUAL Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.9441/2020 Date :25/06/2020 rd 22/07/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/