Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, v. Latha Sundar

C.M.P.No.9588 of 2022 IN T.C.A.No.SR 111780 of 2018 C.M.P.No.9588 of 2022 IN T.C.A.No.SR 111780 of 2018 R. MAHADEVAN, J.

AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ , J.

(Order of the court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.) This petition has been filed by the petitioner/appellant seeking to condone the delay of 1274 days in filing the above T.C.A.No.SR 111780 of 2018.

2. Mr.Karthik Ranganathan, learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant submitted that after assuming the office as standing counsel for the department, he took steps to file the appeals, upon reading the orders passed by the authorities below and drafting the affidavits and grounds of appeals; the appeal papers were subsequently returned by the Registry for certain defects; after complying with the defects, the same were represented; in that process, the delay had occasioned, which is neither wilful nor wanton and hence, the same may be condoned. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.P.No.9588 of 2022 IN T.C.A.No.SR 111780 of 2018 R. MAHADEVAN, J.

AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ , J.

3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner and also taking note of the legal position that the question of limitation is not based on technical consideration, but is on the principles of public policy and equity; and the substantial justice is paramount consideration and pivotal, this court is inclined to condone the delay in representing the appeal. Accordingly, the delay is condoned and this petition is ordered as prayed for.

[R.M.D., J.] [M.S.Q., J.] 21.06.2022 gya C.M.P.No.9588 of 2022 IN T.C.A.No.SR 111780 of 2018 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis