Guna v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Fifth day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.9292 of 2022 GUNA [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE P-4, BASIN BRIDGE POLICE STATION, CHENNAI CRIME NO.42 OF 2022 For Petitioner : M/S. S.MOHANRAJ Advocate For Respondent : MR.S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner herein, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 4(1)(aa) & 4(1-A) of TN Prohibition Act, in Crime No.42 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioner herein, who has engaged the other accused to procure the brandy bottles in whole-sale from the TASMAC shop and sell it in black market, apprehends arrest by the respondent police.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) opposed granting anticipatory bail on the ground that the petitioner herein has arranged for 300 bottles of brandy and sell it in black market and she has six previous cases of prohibition offence. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.

Considering the antecedents and abscondence of the petitioner, the petition for anticipatory bail is dismissed. -sd/- 25/04/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, P-4, BASIN BRIDGE POLICE STATION, CHENNAI 2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S. S.MOHANRAJ Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.9292/2022 Date :25/04/2022 JPA 05/05/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/