Madras High CourtCRP/3488/2016dismissed as infructuous

Mallika v. K.Nanjan(Since Deceased)

2023-02-08Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.02.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and C.M.P.No.17763 of 2016

1. Mallika

2. Mohanraj

3. Pavunraj

4. K.Sivanarayanan

5. Parvathi

6. Saradha

7. Selvaraj

8. Chinraj

9. Nataraj

10. Karthik

11. Subramani

12. Subramani

13. Othiyappan

14. Kaliappan

15. Manoharan

16. Selvakumar

17. Muthaiah

18. Kalimuthu

19. Kannan

20. Prakash

21. Murugan

22. Paneerselvam

23. Paneerselvam

24. Kumar

25. Sagadevan

26. Gopal

27. Selvanayagam

28. Maheswari

29. Chinnasamy

30. Sayammal

31. Sadasivam

32. Patchaiappan

33. Jayasri

34. Govindasamy

35. Parameswaran

36. Gnanaprakasam

37. Thangammal

38. Santhakumari

39. Siva

40. Kanniammal

41. Omana

42. Chinnakannamma

43. Muniammal

44. Thangamani

45. Chellammal

46. Mariyayi

47. Nallammal

48. Vinodkumar

49. Babu

50. Ponnudurai

51. Loganathan

52. Bangaru

53. Lawrence

54. Susairaj

55. Rajeswari

56. Sudevan

57. Perumal

58. Suresh Kumar

59. Sarasu

60. Raman ... Petitioners

Vs.

K.Nanjan (Since deceased)

1. K.Raju (Died)

2. K.Raman

3. R.Sekaran

4. M.Gowri

5. Ruckmani @ Rukiammal (Died)

6. N.Selvaraj

7. N.Thangaraj

8. N.Suresh Kumar (R1 died and R2 to R4 LRs of the deceased R1 viz., K.Raju R5 died and R6 to R8 LRs of the deceased R5 viz., Ruckmani @ Rukiammal as per the memo dated 03.01.2017 and 18.01.2017 and vide Court order dated 18.01.2017 made in C.R.P.No.

3488 of 2016) (Recorded) ... Respondents Prayer :- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the petition order dated 21.10.2016 made in E.A.CFR.No.1946 of 2016 in E.P.No.164 of 1984 in O.S.No.32 of 1963 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Coonoor. For Petitioners : Mr.A.E.Ravi Chandran For Respondents : No appearance

ORDER

The Civil Revision Petition has been listed today under the caption "Default Cases" for non-compliance of the requirements of the Registry, including the payment of batta.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the prayer sought for in this present petition has become infructuous and nothing survive in the present civil revision petition. 3.

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed as infrustuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

08.02.2023 Internet : Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order rts

1. The District Munsif, Coonoor.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

rts and C.M.P.No.17763 of 2016 08.02.2023