A.Paramasivam v. Murugasami

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 19.10.2016 C O R A M THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN S.A.No.185 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008 1.A.Paramasivam 2.Pachiammal 3.K.Govindarajulu 4.K.P.Jyothi Babu 5.K.P.Rangasamy 6.K.S.P.S.Krishna 7.K.P.Prahalad 8.K.P.Paramasivan 9.R.P.Jayalakshmi 10.M.Mallika 11.Minor Anitha rep.by mother and next friend M.Mallika ...

Appellants

Versus

Murugasami ..

Respondent Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree, dated 29.12.2006 passed in A.S.No.4 of 2003 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court No.4) Coimbatore at Tirupur, confirming the judgment and decree dated 30.07.1996 passed in O.S.No.178 of 1995 on the file of the learned District Munsif of Palladam. For Appellants ...

Mr.S.Kingston Jerold For Respondent ...

Mr.V.Lakshminarayanan

JUDGMENT

Since there was no representation on behalf of the appellants on 07.10.2016, the case was posted for dismissal today (19.10.2016). Today, when the appeal is taken up, the learned counsel representing the appellants submitted that the senior counsel who has been engaged to contest the appeal is not well, that apart, there is no instruction from their clients. Since the matter is pending for more than eight years and considering the fact that the appellant are not interested in contesting the appeal, Second Appeal is dismissed for non https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

prosecution. Accordingly Second Appeal is dismissed. Consequently Miscellaneous petition is also closed. No costs. -sdAssistant Registrar /true copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar dpq To

1. The Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court No.4) Coimbatore at Tirupur

2. The District Munsif, Palladam.

3. The Section Officer VR Section, High Court, Madras +1 CC to MR.S.K.Rakhunathan, Advocate SR.No.59428 S.A.No.185 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008 co ks ns 12.11.16 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/