Senthilkumar@ Senthil v. The Inspector Of Police,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.03.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN Crl.OP.No.7847 of 2024 Senthilkumar @ Senthil ...Petitioner Vs.
The state rep by The Inspector of Police, Kariyapattinam Police Station, Nagapattinam District.
Cr.No.24 of 2024
...Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.24 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.U.Kathiravan For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER
The petitioner/accused in Crime No.24 of 2024 who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 21.02.2024, registered by the respondent police for the offences under Sections 341, 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC r/w 1/4
Section 25(1)(a) of Indian Arms Act seeks bail.
2. It is stated that owing to previous enmity, the petitioner had indulged in violence causing injuries to the defacto complainant. It is further stated that the investigation has been completed and charge sheet has been filed.
3. Taking into consideration the period of incarceration and all other factors, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions.
4. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Vedaranyam and on further conditions that:
[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
2/4
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. [c]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
Vv 28.03.2024 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
3/4
Vv To
1. The District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Vedaranyam.
2. The Inspector of Police, Kariyapattinam Police Station, Nagapattinam District.
3.The District Prison, Nagapattinam.
4.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.
Crl.OP.No.7847 of 2024 28.03.2024 4/4