Aravinth Aravinthkumar v. The State Rep, By The Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19-03-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Aravinth @ Aravinthkumar S/o. Elumalai, 53/24 Murugan Nagar, Annadhanapatty, Salem District.
Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep, by The Inspector of Police Annadhanapatty Police Station, Salem District. Crime No. 760 of 2024 Respondent(s) PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on Anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.760 of 2024 pending on the file of the respondent Police and thus render Justice.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr. C R Gokulvisvas For Respondent(s):
Mr. S. Santhosh, Government Advocate
ORDER
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) of BNS in Crime No. 760 of 2024, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that, there was a wordy quarrel arose between the petitioner and the defacto complainant; and that the petitioner has attacked the defacto complainant with stones and thus, committed the aforesaid offence.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the allegations are false; and that in any case, custodial interrogation is not required and sought for anticipatory bail for the petitioner.
4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner,
reiterated the prosecution case and on instructions submitted that there is a counter case and injured has been discharged from the hospital. He further submitted that the petitioner has no bad antecedents.
5. Considering the nature of the allegations, the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, the fact that the petitioner has no bad antecedents, the fact that there is a counter case and since custodial interrogation is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate-IV, Salem, on condition that the petitioner shall execute bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned,
failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.
[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.
19-03-2025 AT
To 1.The State Rep, by The Inspector of Police Annadhanapatty Police Station, Salem District. Crime No. 760 of 2024
SUNDER MOHAN, J.
AT CRL OP No. 8092 of 19-03-2025