P.G.Venugopal v. Thiru.Dr.K.Gopal,Ias

Cont. Petn. No.1026 of 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 07.06.2023

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Cont. Petition No.1026 of 2022 P.G. Venugopal Petitioner v Dr. K. Gopal, I.A.S.

Secretary to Government Transport Department Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009 Thiru. Anbu Abraham Managing Director Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Ltd.

Pallavan Illam, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002 Respondents Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeking to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order dated 11.02.2022 passed in W.A. No.212 of 2022. For petitioner Mr. K. Malaikannu For R1 Mr. S. John J. Raja Singh For R2 Mr. R. Ramanlal, Addl. Adv. Gen.

assisted by Mr. A. Vinodraj

ORDER

This contempt petition has been preferred seeking to punish the respondents for the alleged noncompliance of the order dated 11.02.2022 passed by this Court in W.A. No.212 of 2022.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Cont. Petn. No.1026 of 2022 S. VAIDYANATHAN, J.

and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

cad Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though interest on pension has been disbursed, since the working sheet therefor has not been provided to the petitioner, the petitioner is not in a position to state as to whether the correct amount of interest on pension has been disbursed. Further, according to him, only reduced amount of pension is being paid. We are not inclined to delve into the above aspect in this contempt petition. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedy in the manner known to law and claim the difference amount, if any. With the above observation, this contempt petition stands closed. (S.V.N., J.) (M.S.Q., J.) 07.06.2023 cad Cont. Petn. No.1026 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis