Madras High CourtWP/11586/2019dismissed for nonprosecution

The Food Corporation Of India v. The Chief General Manager (Cpf),

2025-12-03Honourable Mr.Justice T. Vinod Kumar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 03.12.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR and W.M.P.No.11827 of 2019 The Food Corporation of India Retired All Cadre Employees Association Tamil Nadu (Regd. No.195/2017) Rep. By its Secretary, P.Thanikachalam, No.6/110, S.M.Nagar, Vyasarpadi, Chennai - 600 039.

... Petitioner vs

1. The Chief General Manager (CPF), Head Quarters, No.16-20, Barahamea Lane,

2. The Central Provident Fund Commissioner, (HK) for Pension, Ministry of Labour & Employment Government of India, Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan, No.14, Bhikarji Cama Place, New Delhi - 110 066.

3. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Provident Fund Organization, EXEM I & II Regional Office Chennai No.39, Royapettah High Road, Royapettah, Chennai - 600 014.

1/5

4. The Chairman - Managing Director, Head Quarters, "Khad Sadan"

No.16-20, Barakhamba Lane,

5. The Executive Director (South), Zonal Office, No.3, Haddows Road, Chennai - 600 006.

6. The General Manager, No.8, Sathiyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai - 600 031.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the fifth respondent i.e The Executive Director, South, FCI, Chennai - 600 006 by his Ref. NO.EPS/Court Case/TN/IV dated 25.06.2018 and quash the same insofar as prospective effect is concerned and further issue a direction directing to the first and fifth respondents to take necessary actions according with the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Special Leave Petition Nos.3303233033 of 2015 dated 04.10.2016 and to get approval from the concern Government of India as well as Government of Tamil Nadu as per the Provisions of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provision Act and the Employees Pension Scheme 1955 and pass orders. 2/5

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.K.Venkatesan for R2 & R3 : Mr.M.Imthias for R1, R4, R5 & R6

O R D E R

Despite the matter being listed on 20.08.2025, 10.09.2025, 24.09.2025, 15.10.2025, 05.11.2025 and 19.11.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner.

2. Even today (03.12.2025), when the matter is listed under the caption 'for dismissal', there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, which only goes to show that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.

3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

03.12.2025 Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No : Yes / No dh 3/5