Commissioner Of Income Tax Iv v. Shri.Selvanayagam

C.M.P. No. 4553 of 2016 in T.C.A. (SR) No. 456 of 2016 R.MAHADEVAN, J.

and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

Despite the service of notice, there is no representation for the respondent.

2. This petition is filed by the petitioner / appellant seeking to condone the delay of 19 days in filing the above Tax Case Appeal.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, who submitted that the tax effect in this case is less than the threshold limit.

4. Having regard to the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition and being satisfied with the same, the delay is condoned and this petition is accordingly, ordered.

[R.M.D., J.] [M.S.Q., J.] 05.01.2022 Maya Note: Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list for admission.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis