M. Bhuvana Devi v. M.P. Girija

Crl.M.P.No.6130 of 2026 in Crl.RC.SR.No.15752 of 2026 SHAMIM AHMED, J.

Heard Mr. S. Kingston Jerold, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr.S. Mannarsamy, learned counsel for the Respondent.

2. Mr.S.Kingston Jerold, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking to condone the delay of 72 days in filing the criminal revision petition.

3. Mr.S. Mannarsamy, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent has stated that he has no objection to allowing this petition. He further submitted that in compliance of the order dated 11.06.2026, the petitioner is not convinced to settle the dispute, hence the Criminal Revision Case may be taken up for final disposal.

4. In view of the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the condone delay petition, the reason appears to be convincing and genuine, the delay of 72 days in filing the above criminal revision petition is condoned. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

SHAMIM AHMED, J.

msr

5. The Office is directed to number the Crl.R.C. today itself. 29.06.2026 msr Crl.M.P.No.6130 of 2026 in Crl.RC.SR.No.15752 of 2026 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis