Madras High CourtWP/27300/2016settled before the lokadalats

The Management Of Metropolitan v. The Special Deputy

2022-02-24Honourable Mr. Justice N. Authinathan (Retd.)3 pages

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI LOK ADALAT-I ORGANISED BY THE HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE THURSDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022 LOK ADALAT AWARD (CHAPTER VI AND U/S 21 OF LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITIES ACT, 1987) PRESIDED OVER BY THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.AUTHINATHAN (RETD.) AND MEMBER A.MANIVASAKAM, DISTRICT JUDGE,RETD.

W.P.NO.27300 OF 2016 AND W.M.P.NOS.23498 & 23499 OF 2016 PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed to call for the records of the order passed by the 1st respondent in Approval Petition A.P.No.21 of 2012 dated 21.11.2013 and to quash the same as illegal. The Management of Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Ltd., ... Petitioner .Vs.

1. The Special Deputy Commissioner of Labour, (Under Section 33 (2)(B) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947)

2. G.Senthilkumar ... Respondents This case came up for settlement before the Lok Adalat. Both the parties are present. Mr.M.Chidambaram, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.G.Senthilkumar party in person/second respondent and Mr.M.Thamim Basha, Superintendent Legal, MTC, Chennai Limited are present.

TERMS OF SETTLEMENT After mutual discussion, negotiation, mediation and conciliation between both parties, they arrived at a compromise to settle the matter as follows:

2. "Ït is submitted that the 2nd respondent workman agreed to forego the entire back wages from the date of removal (i.e) from 13.01.2012 to till the date of reinstatement without continuity of service with a condition that the 2nd respondent may be reinstated into service as a fresh entrant as Daily Paid Conductor and the Management/Petitioner also agreed the proposal of the 2nd respondent/workman".

3. Both parties are arrived at settlement terms willingly before the Lok Adalat held on 24.02.2022 at 1.00 p.m. No coercion of force is applied to arrive at settlement. This case may be disposed of, as settled accordingly.

4. Both parties have filed a Joint Memo of Compromise and the same is recorded and shall part of the award. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also closed.

5. The full Court fee shall be refunded to the petitioner in the manner provided under Section 69-A of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 and the Court Fees Act, 1870 as provided for under sub Sec.1 of Section 21 r/w 25 of LSA Act 1987 as amended in 1994 and there shall be no demand for additional Court fee.

* Xerox Copy of Joint Memo is enclosed.

The Management of Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Ltd., Counsel for the Petitioner G.Senthilkumar Party - in Person/ Old.No.5/A, New No.62C 2nd respondent Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Lakshmipuram, Kolathur, Chennai - 99.

This Lok Adalat award is passed in terms of the above settlement.

Judge Member Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar drl To: The parties/Advocate concerned Copy To:- 1.

The Management of Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai), Limited, 2.

The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai.

The Section Officer, Writ Section, High Court, Madras.

The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, High Court, Madras. (+2 copies) W.P.NO.27300 OF 2016 SRA(CO) PBS/15/03/2022