Balasubramaniam, v. Minor Loganathan(Deceased)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.09.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN C.R.P (NPD) No.3672 of 2015 Balasubramaniam ... Petitioner vs.
Minor Loganathan (deceased) 1.Minor Sripathi 2.Neelavathi Amaravathi (died) 3.Durairaj Venkataramanasamy (died) 4.Kulandasamy Duraisamy Gounder(died) 5.A.Senthil Nathan 6.Radhakrishnan 7.Muthulakshmi 8.Sivakumar 9.Chitrakala 10.Akila .... Respondents (Minor 1st respondent is represented by his mother / Guardian Neelavathi) Civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order dated 22.12.2014 made in I.A.No.192 of 2008 in O.S.No.134 of 1996 on the
file of the learned District Musif, Kangayam. For petitioner :
Mr.N.Manokaran
ORDER
The revision petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.134 of 1996 on the file of learned District Munsif, Kangayam. It is a partition suit. The suit was dismissed for default, which was not adjudicated on merits. There was a huge delay of 3000 days in re-presentation. Though the said delay was condoned, the Trial Court refused to condone the delay of 87 days in filing an application to set aside the order dismissing the suit for default. The suit is of the year 1996. Now, we are at 2015. The suit was not adjudicated on merits. Even it is admitted by the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner that it is not a bar to file a fresh suit.
2. In view of the same, the civil revision petition is disposed of, with liberty to the revision petitioner to work out his remedies in the manner know to law. No costs. 28.09.2015 Index:Yes/No sbi
To The District Munsif, Kangeyam.
D.HARIPARANTHAMAN,J.
sbi C.R.P (NPD) No.3672 of 2015 DATED: 28.09.2015