P.Murugan v. The Chairman
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.10.2020 CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.8169 of 2015 P.Murugan ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Chairman, Teynampet, Chennai.
2.The Chief Engineer, Office of the Chief Engineer, Villupuram.
3.The Superintendent Engineer, Electricity Board, Vengikal, Capper Hills, Cuddalore - 4.
4.The Executive Engineer, Operation and Maintenance, Cuddalore.
5.The Divisional Engineer, Office of the Divisional Engineer, Periya Kovil Street, Thirupapuliyur, Cuddalore - 2.
6.The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Office of the Assistant Divisional Engineer, Cuddalore OT - 03.
7.The Junior Engineer, Rural Section, Office of the Junior Engineer, Cuddalore OT - 03.
8.The Tahsildar, Cuddalore.
... Respondents (suo motu impleaded vide order dated 03.08.2015)
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to remove the transformer erected on the petitioner patta land.
For Petitioner : Mr.L.Prabahar For Respondents: Mr.M.Varun Kumar Standing Counsel - TNEB (R1 to R7) Ms.A.Madhumathi, Special Government Pleader (R8)
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to remove the transformer erected on the petitioner's patta land. 2.When the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing, Mr.M.Varun Kumar, learned standing counsel for the respondents 1 to 7 submitted that during the pendency of the Writ Petition, the petitioner had sold a portion of the land, where the transformer has been erected, to some third party. Further, the learned standing counsel submitted that the petitioner has no subsisting right in respect of the land over which the transformer has been erected.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though he has not received any instructions with regard to the submission made by the learned standing counsel for the respondents 1 to 7, the submission made by the learned standing counsel for the respondents 1 to 7 may be recorded and the Writ Petition may be closed.
4.Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, recording the submission made by Mr.M.Varun Kumar, learned standing counsel for the respondents 1 to 7, the Writ Petition stands closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS ) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Chairman, Teynampet, Chennai.
2.The Chief Engineer, Office of the Chief Engineer, Villupuram.
3.The Superintendent Engineer, Electricity Board, Vengikal, Capper Hills, Cuddalore - 4.
4.The Executive Engineer, Operation and Maintenance, Cuddalore.
5.The Divisional Engineer, Office of the Divisional Engineer, Periya Kovil Street, Thirupapuliyur, Cuddalore - 2.
6.The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Office of the Assistant Divisional Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Cuddalore OT - 03. 7.The Junior Engineer, Rural Section, Office of the Junior Engineer, Cuddalore OT - 03.
8.The Tahsildar, Cuddalore.
+1 cc to Mr.M.Varunkumar, Advocate,sr.34081.
Sra(co) krd 5/11 W.P.No.8169 of 2015