← Library
Madras High CourtWP/17596/2015disposed of

N.Sridhar v. The Government Of Tamilnadu

2015-06-19Honourable Mr Justice D. Hariparanthaman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 19.06.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.No.17596 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 N.Sridhar ... Petitioner -Versus1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

2.The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 006.

3.The Chief Educational Officer, Saidapet, Chennai 600 015.

4.The District Educational Officer, Chennai East, Chennai 600 094.

5.The Correspondent, K.T.C.T.Girls Higher Secondary School, Chennai 600 079.

...Respondents

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the relief of issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 31.07.2014 with regard to his claim for approval from the date of his appointment and grant approval for the appointment of the petitioner from 06.07.2007, the date of his appointment with all monetary benefits which he is entitled to.

For petitioner : Mr.R.Govindaraj For Respondents : Mr.M.E.Raniselvam, AGP for R1 to R4 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

ORDER

The petitioner was appointed as an Office Assistant in the 5th respondent school on 06.07.2007. The 2nd respondent granted permission to fill up the post on 04.01.2010. While so, the 4th respondent granted approval for appointment from 01.06.2009 by his order dated 29.12.2010. In this regard, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 31.07.2014 to the respondents for the grant of approval from the date of his appointment. Now, the grievance of the petitioner is that his representation has not so far been considered. Hence, he has come forward with this writ petition seeking appropriate direction to the 4th respondent to consider his representation in the light of the order dated 08.06.2012 made in W.P.No.10325 of 2012 [M.Sekar v. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secretary, Department of School Education, Chennai and others].

2. I have heard the submissions made on either side.

3. In view of the narrow prayer made, the 4th respondent is directed to consider the representation made by the petitioner on 31.07.2014 in the light of the judgement referred to above and pass appropriate orders within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected MP is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub Assistant Registrar kmk To 1.The Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

2.The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 006.

3.The Chief Educational Officer, Saidapet, Chennai 600 015. 4.The District Educational Officer, Chennai East, Chennai 600 094. 1 cc to Mr.R.Govindaraj , Advocate Sr.No.30413 W.P.No.17596 of 2015 tm(co) pmk.2.7.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/