N.P.Kumar, v. Govindaraji,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23.08.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.BASKARAN Second Appeal No.1240 of 2006 and M.P.No.1 of 2006 1.N.P.Kumar 2.P.Venkateswaralu .. Appellants/Plaintiffs Vs.

1.Govindaraji 2.Arul .. Respondents/Defendants Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and Decree dated 27.06.2006 made in A.S.No.22 of 2004 on the file of Principal Subordinate Court, Tindivanam, reversing the judgment and decree dated 24.12.2003 made in O.S.No.129 of 2001 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Tindivanam.

For Appellants : Mr.M.Venkatachalapathy, Senior counsel for Mr.M.Sriram For Respondents: Mr.G.Justin.

J U D G M E N T

Both parties are present before the court with their respective counsel. Compromise Memo dated 23 August, 2017 is filed. The contents of the memo has been explained to the parties and they agreed and admitted the contents. The compromise memo filed by the appellants and the respondents signed by the parties and their respective counsel is recorded. In such circumstances, the Second Appeal is allowed in terms of the compromise memo. The compromise memo will form part of the decree. Consequently, the Suit in O.S.No.129 of 2001 is disposed of in terms of the compromise memo. No costs. Connected MP is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar nvsri https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The Principal Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam.

2.The Principal District Munsif, Tindivanam.

3.The Section officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.M.Sriram, Advocate SR.No.61397 Second Appeal No.1240 of 2006 SAI(CO) GN(18/09/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/