Ramkumar v. Sub Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 12.02.2016 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.MALA Crl.O.P.Nos.2319 and 4975 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1, 1 and 2 of 2011 Ramkumar

...Petitioner in Crl.OP.2319/11

1.

Saraswathi 2.

Sundaram 3.

Rajkumar

...Petitioners in Crl.OP.4975/11

Versus

1.State represented by The Sub Inspector of Police Athur All Women Police Station Salem District.

2.Vedha ... Respondents in both Crl.OPs Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C to call for the records in C.C.No.286 of 2009 and quash the same against the petitioners pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Athur.

For Petitioners in both cases : Mr.S.Sadasharam For Respondent-1 in both cases : Mr. C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor For Respondent-2 in both cases : Mr.R.Vijayakumar

O R D E R

Today the petitioners and the second respondent in both the cases with their respective counsel are present. They also filed a joint memorandum of compromise and they accepted the terms of joint memorandum of compromise.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.

Since it is a matrimonial dispute and both parties settled the matter and accepted the terms of compromise, that too the defacto complainant accepted the same, recording the memorandum of compromise, the Criminal Original Petitions are allowed and the charge sheet filed in C.C.No.286 of 2009 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Athur, is quashed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.I Athur.

2. Do Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Salem.

3. The Sub Inspector of Police Athur All Women Police Station Salem District.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+2cc's to Mr.S.Sadasharam, Advocate, S.R.No.9222 Crl.O.P.Nos.2319 and 4975 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1, 1 and 2 of 2011 UG(CO) CA(19/02/2016) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/