← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/10034/2021dismissed

Haribabu v. The Inspector Of Police

2021-06-09Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09.06.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL.O.P.No.10034 of 2021 and Crl.M.P.No.6127 of 2021 1.Haribabu 2.Vasanthakumar 3.Sivaraj 4.Vadivel @ Mark Gopal 5.Kumaresan ... Petitioners Vs 1.The State Rep by.

Inspector of Police, Ambur Town Police Station, Vellore District.

(Crime No.92 of 2021).

2. Saraswathi ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying to call for the records and to quash the FIR in Crime No.92 of 2021, dated 18.02.2021 as far as the petitioner are concerned, pending on the file of the 1st respondent. For Petitioners: Mr.K.Balasubramaniam For Respondents: Mr.A.Damodaran Government Advocate (Crl.Side) (for R-1)

O R D E R

This petition has been filed to quash the F.I.R. in Crime No.92 of 2021 registered by the first respondent police for offence under Sections 147, 148, 120(B), 294(B), 403, 441, 442, 448 and 506(ii) of IPC, as against the petitioners.

2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. Without any base, the first respondent police registered a case in Crime No.92 of 2021 for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 120(B), 294(B), 403, 441, 442, 448 and 506(ii) of IPC, as against the petitioners. Hence he prayed to quash the FIR in Crime No.92 of 2021 dated 18.02.2021. He would further submit that the counter case filed by the petitioners was registered in Crime No.93 of 2021 for the offences under Sections 463, 464, 465, 467, 468, 470, 471, 472, 473, 475, and 476 of IPC as against the de-facto complainant and two others.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the investigation is almost completed and the first respondent police have only to file final report.

4. Heard K.Balasubramaniam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.A.Damodaran, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the first respondent.

5. It is seen from the First Information Report that there are specific allegations as against the petitioners to attract the offences, which has to be investigated in depth. Further, the FIR as against the petitioners is not an encyclopedia and it need not contain all facts and it cannot be quashed in the threshold. This Court finds that the FIR discloses prima facie commission of cognizable offences and as such this Court cannot interfere with the investigation. The investigating machinery has to step in to investigate, grab and unearth the crime in accordance with the procedures prescribed in the Code.

6. It is relevant to rely upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India passed in Crl.A.No.255 of 2019 dated 12.02.2019 in the case of Sau. Kamal Shivaji Pokarnekar vs. the State of Maharashtra & ors., as follows:- "4. The only point that arises for our consideration in this case is whether the High Court was right in setting aside the order by which process was issued. It is settled law that the Magistrate, at the stage of taking cognizance and summoning, is required to apply his judicial mind only with a view to taking cognizance of the offence, or in other words, to find out whether a prima facie case has been made out for summoning the accused persons. The learned Magistrate is not required to evaluate the merits of the material or evidence in support of the complaint,

because the Magistrate must not undertake the exercise to find out whether the materials would lead to a conviction or not.

5. Quashing the criminal proceedings is called for only in a case where the complaint does not disclose any offence, or is frivolous, vexatious, or oppressive. If the allegations set out in the complaint do not constitute the offence of which cognizance has been taken by the Magistrate, it is open to the High Court to quash the same. It is not necessary that a meticulous analysis of the case should be done before the Trial to find out whether the case would end in conviction or acquittal. If it appears on a reading of the complaint and consideration of the allegations therein, in the light of the statement made on oath that the ingredients of the offence are disclosed, there would be no justification for the High Court to interfere.

......................

9. Having heard the learned Senior Counsel and examined the material on record, we are of the considered view that the High Court ought not to have set aside the order passed by the Trial Court issuing summons to the Respondents. A perusal of the complaint discloses that prima facie, offences that are alleged against the Respondents. The correctness or otherwise of the said allegations has to be decided only in the Trial. At the initial stage of issuance of process it is not open to the Courts to stifle the proceedings by entering into the merits of the contentions made on behalf of the accused. Criminal complaints cannot be quashed only on the ground that the allegations made therein appear to be of a civil nature. If the ingredients of the offence alleged against the accused are prima facie made out in the complaint, the criminal proceeding shall not be interdicted."

7. In view of the above discussion, this Court is not inclined to quash the First Information Report filed as against the petitioners. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. However, it is seen that the case in Crime No.93 of 2021 was also registered as against the de-facto complainant and two others, based on the complaint given by the petitioners herein. Therefore, this court is inclined to direct the first respondent to complete the investigation both in Crime Nos.92 and 93 of 2021 and file a final report, within a period

of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the jurisdiction Magistrate, if not already filed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kv To

1. The Inspector of Police, Ambur Town Police Station, Vellore District.

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

CRL.O.P.No.10034 of 2021 SR-II(CO) CB(14/07/2021)