Madras High CourtCRL OP/7197/2026dismissed

Ramesh v. The State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police

2026-03-23Honourable Mr.Justice C.Kumarappan2 pages

CRL OP No. 7197 of 2026

1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 7197 of 2026 Ramesh ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police Polur Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District.

Crime No. 11/2026.

..Respondent(s) Prayer:- Criminal original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in Crime No.11 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police station and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s):

Mr.Sathiyaraj E.

For Respondent(s):

Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate(Criminal side)

ORDER

The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Section 303 (2), 326 (a) of BNS Act and Section 21 (5) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.11 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had illegally transported 1⁄4 unit of river sand in a bullock cart. Hence, the case. __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CRL OP No. 7197 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN, J

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and that he is ready to cooperate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submits that petitioner has three previous cases and has been regularly doing similar nature of offences. Hence, he opposed the grant of anticipatory bail.

5.From the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), it is pellucid that the petitioner has misused the liberty which had been granted by this Court in earlier point of time. Hence, this is not a fit case to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed.

23-03-2026 ep To 1.The Inspector of Police Polur Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District.

2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras.

CRL OP No. 7197 of 2026 __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis