R.Manikandan v. The State Rep. By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.07.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.9928 of 2020 R.Manikandan ... Petitioner Vs.
State Rep. By ... Respondent The Inspector of Police, Bagayam Police Station, Vellore District.
(Crime No. 698 of 2020) Dated 16.06.2020) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest concerned in Crime Number 698 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Prakasam For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 4(3) of TN Gaming Act, 1930 and 420 of IPC, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. It is the case of the prosecution that one D. Sukumar, the defacto complainant had given the complaint before the respondent herein that one Murugan and the petitioner deliberately induced him to invest Rs.30/- (Rupees Thirty only) daily in cotton gambling and the petitioner assured profits of 50 times for which he invested and thereby cheated the defacto complainant. Hence the complaint.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he was no way connected with the allegation made by respondent police. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner.
5. This Court is of the opinion that the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) as non refundable deposit to the credit of the Chief Minister Public Relief Fund, Tamil Nadu, without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court. Merely, because the petitioner has deposited the said amount, it would not amount to admission of his guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently.
6. Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) as non refundable deposit to the credit of the Chief Minister Public Relief Fund, Tamil Nadu within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready and on such deposit the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Vellore, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.
10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[b] the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) to the credit of the Chief Minister Public Relief Fund, Tamil Nadu, and shall produce the said receipt before the Court below.
[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m.,for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.
[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
-sd/- 02/07/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, VELLORE.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VELLORE. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BAGAYAM POLICE STATION, VELLORE.
5 THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, THE CHIEF MINISTER PUBLIC RELIEF FUND, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI 600 009.
CC to M/S. J.PRAKASAM Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.9928/2020 Date :02/07/2020 TA-28/07/2020