K.Ezhilarasan Alias Ezhilarasu v. State Rep By

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 506(ii) and 307 of IPC in Crime No.313 of 2022, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to land dispute, there was a wordy quarrel between the petitioners and the defacto complainant's husband. It is also alleged that the petitioner attacked the defacto complainant's husband with wooden log and stones and caused grievous injuries. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocents and they are no way connected with the alleged offence. He would further submit that this is the fifth petition for anticipatory bail. He would further submit that the alleged occurrence have taken place on 27.07.2022 and thereby, he would seek for anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police would submit that after the dismissal of the earlier applications, there is no change of circumstances and thereby, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5.Heard the learned counsel and perused the entire materials available on record including the First Information Report. 6.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and only now the petitioner has deposit the cost of R.5,000/- to the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, Chennai and that there is no change of circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

14.06.2023 drl

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

drl 14.06.2023