← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/3804/2016dismissed for nonprosecution

A.C. Muniyan, v. The President,

2022-01-28Honourable Mr Justice J.Sathya Narayana Prasad4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 28.01.2022 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD and C.M.P.No.19446 of 2016 A.C.Muniyan

...Petitioner

Versus

1.The President, Melputhiyandhal Village Panchayat, Melputhiyandal Village, Thiruvannamalai Taluk & District.

2.V.Rajagopal Director, Srisha Infra Private Limited, Melputhiyandal Village, Thiruvannamalai Taluk & District.

3.V.K.Sathya Director, Srisha Infra Private Limited, Melputhiyandal Village, Thiruvannamalai Taluk & District.

1/4

4.The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District.

...Respondents

This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 21.10.2016 in I.A.No.498 of 2016 in O.S.No.205 of 2015 on the file of Principal Subordinate Judge, Thiruvannamalai. For Petitioner :

No Appearance For Respondents - 1 & 4 :

Mr.M.Bindran, Additional Govt. Pleader Respondent - 2 :

No Appearance Respondent - 3 :

Mr.R.Kannan

O R D E R

When the matter was called on two occasions viz., 10.12.2021 & 06.01.2022 respectively, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption, "For Dismissal" on 27.01.2022.

2/4

2. Today (28.01.2022), the case is listed under the caption, "For Dismissal". Even today, when the matter was called, there was no representation for the petitioner. However, Mr.M.Bindran, learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents 1 & 4 and Mr.R.Kannan, learned counsel for the third respondent are present before this Court. With an intention of giving one more opportunity to the petitioner, the matter was passed over and called again. Even when the matter was called again, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, this Court has no other option, except to dismiss the Civil Revision Petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 28.01.2022 mrr Index : Yes/No 3/4

J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

mrr To 1.The Principal Subordinate Judge, Thiruvannamalai.

2.The President, Melputhiyandhal Village Panchayat, Melputhiyandal Village, Thiruvannamalai Taluk & District.

3.The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District.

28.01.2022 4/4