A Chidambaram v. Dr S Rajagopal
2025:MHC:2788
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01-12-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN and CMP NO. 7572 of 2025 A.Chidambaram Appellant(s) Vs 1.Dr.S.Rajagopal 2.Vasuki Rajagopal 3.S.Vengataraman 4.S Ramesh 5.M/s.DLF Southern Towns Pvt Ltd.
(substituted) registered Office at No. 1st Floor, DLF Gateway Tower, R Block, DLF City Phase-III, Gurugram 122002, Haryana and Zonal Office at No. 268, Poonamallee High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai 010 Rep by its Authorised Signatory R.GITA KRISHNA.
CAUSE TITLE AMENDED IN R5 Page No.1 of 6
PORTION VIDE ORDER OF COURT DATED.04.09.2025 MADE IN CMP.21759 OF 2025 IN OSA.124 OF 6.A Velu (DECEASED) 7.V.Govindammal 8.V.Gowri 9.V.Nirmala 10.V.Balaji 11.V.Gomathi (R7 to R11 brought on record as LRs of deceased R6 viz (A.VELU) vide order of court dt.18.09.2025 made in CMP 19339/25, 19341/25,19347/25 in OSA 124/2025.
Respondent(s) PRAYER Original Side Appeal has been filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of the Original Side Rules, 1994 and Clause 15 of Letters Patent of 1865, praying To set aside the Fair order and decreetal order dated 17-02-2025 passed in O.A.No.843/2024 and allow the Original Side Appeal For Appellant(s):
R. Sagadevan For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Venkatraman For R1 & R2 No Appearance For R3 & R4 Mr.P.S.Raman, Senior Counsel And Mr.Jayesh B.Dolia, Senior Counsel For M/s.Aiyar And Dolia For R5.
Page No.2 of 6
R6-Died Steps taken Mr.K.M.Anand For R7 to R11 Page No.3 of 6
J U D G M E N T
(Judgment was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant after arguing the grounds would submit that the appellant may be permitted to raise all his objections before the learned Single Judge in O.P.No.60 of 2024.
2. The learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents would submit that the subject property has been alienated and if any claim, must be regarding compensation and therefore, all the issues are to be adjudicated before the OP Court.
3. Since the learned counsel for the appellant would submit before this Court that the OP Court may be directed to dispose of the appeal, this Court is not inclined to accept such contention. However, the appellant is permitted to request the learned Single Judge to dispose of the OP as expeditiously as possible.
Page No.4 of 6
4. Recording the above said submission made on behalf of the appellant, the present Original Side Appeal stands disposed of. No costs. The connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
(S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.)(C.KUMARAPPAN J.) 01-12-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Jeni Page No.5 of 6
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.
AND C.KUMARAPPAN J.
Jeni 01-12-2025 Page No.6 of 6