A.Natarajan v. The Commissioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 10.04.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2015 A.Natarajan

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Commissioner, Erode Corporation, Erode.

2.M/s.Seven Star Enterprises, Algapuram, Salem.

..Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records with respect of the impugned agenda dated 23.03.2015 issued by the 1st respondent proceedings in E2/7340/14 regarding resolution Number 121 is concerned and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Ms.Jeevitha For Mr.R.Nalliyappan For R1 : Mr.M.Rajamathivanan For R2 : Not Ready in Notice 1/3

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner made a submission that the writ petition has become infructuous. Thus, no further adjudication is required. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. Recording the above said submission and endorsement of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

10.04.2023 Index : Yes kak To 1.The Commissioner, Erode Corporation, Erode.

2.M/s.Seven Star Enterprises, Algapuram, Salem.

2/3

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

kak 10.04.2023 3/3