T.Meenakshi Sundaram, v. The Commissioner,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUARE AT MADRAS

DATED: 26.03.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA W.P.No.27454 of 2016 T.Meenakshi Sundram .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The Commissioner, Uthagamandalam Panchayat/Municipality, Uthagamandalam.

2. G.Sivaraj ... Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the representation / reply dated 19.07.2016 seeking regularization towards regulation of water connection already extended by acceptance of Tax/fee up to date and to consequently allow the petitioner to use the equipments therein without any hindrance and peacefully thereto. For Petitioner : Ms.N.R.Jasmine Padma For Respondent-1 : Mr.P.Srinivas For Respondent-2 : Mr. V.M.Ravichandran

O R D E R

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer in the Writ Petition has become infructuous and sought permission of this Court to withdraw the same. Se has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.

s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS V) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The Commissioner, Uthagamandalam Panchayat/Municipality, Uthagamandalam.

+1 CC to Mr.P.Srinivas, Advocate sr 29420.

+1 CC to Mr.P.M.Duraiswamy, Advocate sr 28335. W.P.No.27454 of 2016 SJ(CO) SP(27/04/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/