← Library
Madras High CourtHCP/846/2018closed

Sumathi, Aged 40 Years, v. State Rep. By

2018-04-28Honourable Mr Justice T. Ravindran,Honourable Mr Justice M. Venugopal3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.04.2018

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN H.C.P.No.846 of 2018 Sumathi .... Petitioner vs.

State, rep.by 1.The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram, 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Villupurram, 3.Inspector of Police, Mylam Police Station, Villupuram, Villupuram District ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of habeas corpus to issue a WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, directing the Respondents to produce the petitioner's husband Ramakrishnan, son of Late Arumuga Gounder, aged about 48 years, before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.S.N.Arunkumar for M/s.D.Krishnamoorthy For Respondents : Mr.R.Ravichandran Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by M.VENUGOPAL,J.) Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the Respondents. 2.As seen from the Status-report of the Sub-Inspector of Police, Mailam Police Station, Villupuram District, it comes to

be known that the accused-Manikandan, Arul Murugan and Ramakrishnan (detenu herein/husband of the Petitioner herein) were arrested by the Inspector of police, Mailam Police Station, on 26.4.2018 and statements were recorded in the presence of witnesses (1)Manikandan, Village Administrative Officer, Kutteripattu Village and 2)Murugan, Mailam Village and based on the confession of the accused, a sum of Rs.11,98,000/- was recovered from the detenu/accused-Ramakrishnan. In short, the version of the Respondents is that the Detenu-Ramakrishnan (accused) was produced before the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tindivanam and he was remanded to judicial custody. 3.In view of the fact that the Detenu (Petitioner's husband) was remanded to judicial custody by the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tindivanam, in Crime No.

122 of 2018, Mylam Police Station, Mylam, in respect of offences under Sections 419, 420, 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. 4.Recording the aforesaid fact, the present Habeas Corpus Petition is closed, as no further orders are necessary. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar msk To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram, 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Villupuram, 3.

4. The Judicial Magistrate-II, Tindivanam, Villupuram District.

5.do- Throught The Chief Judicial Magistrate,

6. The Secretary to Government, Home Department, Prohibition and Excise, Secretariat, Fort. ST.George, Chennai-9.

7. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras-104 +1cc to Mr.D.Krishnamoorthy, Advocate SR.No.32207 H.C.P.No.846 of 2018 NRL(CO) GN(17/05/2018)