Madras High CourtCRL OP/10214/2020dismissed

Pradeep v. State By

2020-07-07Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :07.07.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No. 10214 of 2020 Pradeep ... Petitioner Vs.

State by The Inspector of Police, S 10, Pallikaranai Police Station, Kanchipuram District.

(Cr. No.897 of 2020) ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.897 of 2020 on the file of the Inspector of Police, S 10, Pallikaranai Police Station, Kanchipuram District. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Gopalakrishnan For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 332, 397 and 506(II) IPC, in Crime No.897 of 2020, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused had waylaid the de-facto complainant and demanded money by using filthy language and took a sum of Rs.350/-. Hence, the complaint was registered.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Therefore, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner along with other accused had waylaid the de-facto complainant and demanded money by using filthy language and took a sum of Rs.350/-. He would further submit that there are ten previous cases pending as against the petitioner. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Considering the above fact and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the petitioner had committed serious offence and there are ten previous cases pending as against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

1. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 07/07/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.II, ALANDUR 2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, S10, PALLIKARANAI POLICE STATION, KANCHIPURAM DISTRICT.

CC to M/S. B.GOPALAKRISHNAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.10214/2020 Date :07/07/2020 RVR 01/09/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/