← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/4257/2015disposed of

Rotary Club Of Maraimalai Naga v. A.Ubramaniam

2016-03-21Honourable Mr Justice P.R.Shivakumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 21.03.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR C.R.P.[PD] No.4257 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 1.Rotary Club of Maraimalai Nagar Rep by its President L.Kumaran 14/16, L.I.G., N.H.1., Ponmudiyar Street, Maraimalai Nagar-603 209.

2.P.Vijararam, Member, Rotray Club of Maraimalai Nagar, No.13/1, N.H.2., Sangamitrai Street, Maraimalai Nagar-603 209.

... Petitioners Vs 1.A.Subramaniam Sole Arbitrator Old No.12, New No.46, East Club Road, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai-30.

2.P.Perumal 3.C.R.Raju ... Respondents Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the judgment and order dated 15.09.2015 in I.A.No.873 of 2015 in Arbitration O.P.No.4 of 2015 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu. For Petitioners : Mr.Gupta For R1 and R3 : Mr.N.Vijayabaskar For R2 : Mr.J.Kannan

O R D E R

Though the petitioners have approached this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order of the Court below dated 15.09.2015 made in I.A.No.873 of 2015 in Arbitration O.P.No.4 of 2015 on the file of the Court below rejecting the prayer for injunction pending disposal of the arbitration O.P., the learned counsel for the petitioners in the revision, without going into the merits of the matter would fairly make a submission that the Civil Revision Petition may be disposed of without interfering with the impugned order, but at the same time fixing a time limit for the disposal of the Arbitration O.P.

2. Learned counsels for the contesting respondents also submit that they are not averse for getting such an order fixing a time for the disposal of the Arbitration O.P and thereby, they also expressed their consent for such an order.

3. In view of the above said submissions, the Civil Revision Petition challenging the order dated 15.09.2015 made in I.A.No.873 of 2015 in Arbitration O.P.No.4 of 2015 is dismissed. However, the learned Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu is directed to hear the Arbitration O.P.No.4 of 2015 and dispose of the same on or before the last working day in April 2016. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

21.03.2016 gya

To The Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu.

P.R.SHIVAKUMAR, J.

gya C.R.P.[PD] No.4257 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 21.03.2016