E.Anbu v. The State Rep.By Inspector Of Police,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.03.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN E.Anbu
...Petitioner/Accused
Vs.
State rep by The Inspector of Police, Mangadu Police Station, Kancheepuram District.
(Crime No.821 of 2024) ...
Respondent PRAYER: This criminal original petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.821 of 2024 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner :
Mr.S.Sekar For Respondent :
Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.11.2024, seeking bail Page No.1 of 6
in Crime No.821 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 331(4) and 305 of BNS, 2023.
2.It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner along with the other accused had committed theft of 10 sovereigns of gold jewels in the house of the defacto complainant. Hence, the case. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he is in custody from 13.11.2024 and hence, further custody of the petitioner is not required. 4.Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there are five previous cases pending against the petitioner and he is on bail in those cases; that 5 1⁄2 sovereigns of gold jewels had been recovered and that charge sheet has been filed.
5.Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.
Page No.2 of 6
6.Considering the nature of allegations, period of incarceration, the fact that the petitioner is on bail in all the previous cases, the fact that some part of stolen articles have been recovered, final report has been filed and since further custody of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of interrogation, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
7.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumpudur, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; Page No.3 of 6
[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];
[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.
21.03.2025 ata Page No.4 of 6
Copy to:
1.The Inspector of Police, Mangadu Police Station, Kancheepuram District.
2.The Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumpudur.
3.Central Prison, Vellore.
4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
Page No.5 of 6
SUNDER MOHAN, J.
ata 21.03.2025 Page No.6 of 6