Madras High CourtCRL OP/10342/2020dismissed

Muthan @ Muthusamy v. State Rep By

2020-07-09Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.07.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.10342 of 2020 1.Muthan @ Muthusamy ... Petitioners 2.Guna @ Gunaseelan Vs.

State Represented by ... Respondent The Inspector of Police, Dhali Police Station, Tiruppur District.

Cr. No.699 of 2020 Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to grant Anticipatory bail to the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before any Court in connection with the case in Crime No.699 of 2020,on the file of the Respondent police.

For Petitioners : Mr.D.R.Arun Kumar For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 342, 323, 506(2)IPC in Crime No.699 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioners waylaid the defacto complainant Muruganantham and due to previous enmity, picked up a quarrel with him and thereafter attacked the defacto complainant with iron rod resulting in the defacto complainant sustaining injuries. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioners are notorious persons https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

and they have bad antecedents. Having engaged by other accused they have threatened and assaulted the defacto complainant, resulting in the defacto complainant sustaining injuries and hospitalisation. Hence, he opposed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5.Taking into consideration the bad antecedent of the petitioners and they have also assaulted the defacto complainant resulting in the defacto complainant sustaining grevious injuries, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6.With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.

-sd/- 09/07/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DHALI POLICE STATION, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S. D.R.ARUN KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.10342/2020 Date :09/07/2020 MN-RD-03/08/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/