B.Deva Senthilnathan v. J.Vijayalakshmi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.09.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI and C.M.P.No.7457 of 2023 B.Deva Senthilnathan S/o. D.Babu ..Appellant Vs.
J. Vijayalakshmi D/o.G.Jayaraman ..Respondent Prayer: The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 19 of Family Courts Act to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 28.02.2020 passed in I.A.No.5291 of 2018 in O.P.No.4527 of 2017 by the IV Additional Principal Judge, IV Additional Family Court, Chennai. For Appellant : Mr.A.Arun For Respondent : Mr.Yaswini Vijayakumar - - - - -
JUDGMENT
Page 1/4
(The order of the Court was made by Mrs.J.NISHA BANU, J.) This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the appellant/husband challenging the fair and decreetal order dated 28.02.2020 passed in I.A.No.5291 of 2018 in O.P.No.4527 of 2017 by the IV Additional Principal Judge, IV Additional Family Court, Chennai.
2. As per Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, an appeal against the interlocutory application will not lie and an appeal will lie only as against the judgment or order of the Family Court. Further, in the case of G.V.N.S.Siva Prasad vs. V.Jyostna Devi made in C.M.A.No.1018 of 2022 dated 27.03.2024, the Division Bench of this Court, after referring to the judgment of S.Menaka v. K.S.K. Nepolian Socraties and other High Court) and 2024 Live Law (Mad) 126 held that as against the interlocutory applications/ interim maintenance, only Civil Revision Petition under 227 of the Constitution of India, would lie and not Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.
Page 2/4
3. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.
4. In the light of the aforesaid judgment and in view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file Civil Revision Petition. On filing of the Civil Revision Petition, for the purpose of limitation, the period spent in prosecuting the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal shall be excluded.
5. If the learned counsel for the appellant requests for return of certified copy of the impugned order, the same shall be returned to him forthwith under due acknowledgement. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
(J.N.B., J.) (R.K.M., J.) 09.09.2024 asi J. NISHA BANU, J.
Page 3/4
and R.KALAIMATHI, J.
asi To The IV Additional Family Court, Chennai.
and C.M.P.No.7457 of 2023 09.09.2024 Page 4/4