Pushpa v. The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Seventeenth day of August Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.14434 of 2021 PUSHPA [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs SATATE REP. BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE P1 PULIYANTHOPE POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

(CR.NO.268 OF 2021) For Petitioner : M/S.V.DINESH KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.GOPINATH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 4(1)(a), 4 (1-A) of TNP Act and Section 328 of IPC, in Crime No.268 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. This is the second anticipatory bail application filed before this Court. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused persons were found in illegal possession of 28 liquor bottles and 14 Kgs of Mava and the same was seized by the respondent police.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and she has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that earlier anticipatory bail application was dismissed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.6651 of 2021 dated 09.04.2021. He further submits that there are eighteen previous cases pending as against the petitioner and he is a habitual offender. Hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that there are eighteen previous cases pending as against the petitioner and earlier application was dismissed by this Court and there is no change of circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 17/08/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, P1 PULIYANTHOPE POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.V.DINESH KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.14434/2021 Date :17/08/2021 CSK 13/09/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/