Nlc India Ltd v. Taqa Neyveli Lignite Power Company Pvt Ltd
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.04.2023 CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.T.RAJA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and C.M.P.No.8046 of 2023 NLC India Ltd.
Presently at:
First Floor, No. 8, Mayor Sathiyamurthy Road, FSD, Egmore Complex of Food Corporation of India, Chetpet, Chennai - 600 031.
Formerly at:
135 EVR Road Kilpauk, Chennai - 600 010.
Represented by its Chairman / Managing Director ... Appellant
Versus
TAQA Neyveli Lignite Power Company Pvt. Ltd.
(Formerly known as ST-CMS Electric Co. Pvt. Ltd.) Presently at:
79, Kasturi Avenue, MRC Nagar, RA Puram, Chennai - 600 028.
Formerly at:
4-D, Century Plaza 560-562, Mount Road, Chennai.
1/5
Represented by its Company Secretary, K.Raghunathan ... Respondent Prayer : Original Side Appeal - Commercial Appellate Division filed under Section 13(1)(A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Section 37(1)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside the impugned order dated 09.03.2023 in Original Application No.111 of 2023. For Appellant : Mr.A.R.L.Sundaresan, Senior Counsel Assisted by Mr.S.S.Arjun For Respondent : Mr.P.S.Raman, Senior Counsel Assisted by Mr.Thriyambak J.Kannan
JUDGMENT
(Made by the Hon'ble Mr.Justice D.Bharatha Chakravarthy) This Original Side Appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge, dated 09.03.2023 in O.A.No.111 of 2023 granting an interim order of injunction in the application filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
2. When the matter came up for hearing, considering the fact that the learned Single Judge himself has restricted the interim order only for a period of one month from the date of initiation of arbitration proceedings, 2/5
today both the sides filed memos indicating their nominee Arbitrators to the Tribunal. On behalf of the appellant, the memo has been filed nominating Ms.Justice Indu Malhotra, learned Retired Judge of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India as its nominee Arbitrator. It is also informed that the learned Judge had consented to be the learned Arbitrator.
3. A memo has been filed on behalf of the respondent nominating Mr.Justice L.Nageshwar Rao, learned Retired Judge of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India as its nominee and that the learned Judge had consented for the same.
4. In view there of, both the learned Arbitrators have to meet and nominate the Presiding Arbitrator and the arbitration proceedings shall continue. Upon constitution of the Arbitration Tribunal, the said interim prayer, which is prayed for in the present O.A.No.111 of 2023, shall be considered by the Tribunal under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 without being, in any manner, influenced by the observations made by the learned Single Judge, but, on its own merits. It 3/5
goes without saying that all the questions raised by the parties in this appeal are left open to be raised before the learned Arbitrators.
5. The Original Side Appeal in O.S.A.(CAD).No.35 of 2023 is disposed off on the above terms. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (T.R., ACJ.) (D.B.C., J.) 27.04.2023 Index : yes/no Speaking order/Non-speaking order : yes/no grs 4/5
T.RAJA, ACJ., AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J., grs and C.M.P.No.8046 of 2023 27.04.2023 5/5