← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/1644/2022dismissed for default

C.Srinivasan v. S.Mani

2025-10-25Honourable Mr.Justice R.Sakthivel4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 25/10/2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL C.R.P.(NPD)NO.1644 OF 2022 AND C.M.P.NO.8222 OF 2022 C.Srinivasan, S/o.Chinnasamy, Avathavadi Village and Post, Krishnagiri Taluk and District.

...

Petitioner/ Petitioner/ 1st Defendant Vs.

S.Mani, S/o.Subramani, Avathavadi Village and Post, Krishnagiri Taluk and District.

... Respondent/Respondent/ Plaintiff PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to set aside the fair and decreetal Order passed by the Additional Special Court, Krishnagiri in I.A.No.2 of 2021 in O.S.No.102 of 2013 dated November 12, 2021 and to allow the Interlocutory Application as prayed for.

For Petitioner :

Ms.V.Geethalakshmi Page No.1 of 4

for Mr.V.Gunasekar For Respondent :

Not ready in notice

O R D E R

Ms.V.Geethalakshmi representing Mr.V.Gunasekar, counsel on record for the Revision Petitioner is before this Court. 2.Learned counsel for the appellant is not ready to argue the matter and seeks short accommodation. Request not acceded for the following reasons:

(i)The Daily Order dated October 16, 2025 reads thus: "There is no representation for the revision petitioner.

2.List this matter on 24.10.2025 under the cause list caption "for dismissal"."

(ii)The Daily Order dated 24.10.2025 reads thus: "The Daily Order dated 16.10.2025 reads thus:

There is no representation for the revision petitioner.

2.List this matter on 24.10.2025 under the cause list Page No.2 of 4

caption "for dismissal".

2.Today also there is no representation for the Revision Petitioner.

3.With a view to give one more opportunity to the Revision Petitioner, list the matter under the cause list caption "for dismissal" on 25.10.2025." 3.As it could be seen from the previous daily order extracts, despite sufficient opportunities, the Revision Petitioner did not choose to argue this Civil Revision Petition. Under such circumstances, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the Civil Revision Petition for default. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.

25/10/2025 Index : Yes Speaking Order : Yes : Yes pam R. SAKTHIVEL, J.

pam To Page No.3 of 4

The Additional Special Court, Krishnagiri.

C.R.P.(NPD)NO.1644 OF 2022 25/10/2025 Page No.4 of 4