Mohamed Arief v. The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08.11.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN CRL.A.No.329 of 2012 Mohamed Arief ... Appellant/Accused vs.

State by Inspector of Police, Karaikal Town Police Station, Karaikal.

(Crime No.312/2008) ... Respondent/Complainant Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to set-aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the Appellant/1st Accused in S.C.No.73/2011 on 28.03.2012 by the Additional District Sessions Judge, Karaikal by allowing the appeal.

For Appellant :

No appearance For Respondent :

Mr.V.R.Thangavelu Government Advocate (Pondy)

O R D E R

It is seen that when the above Appeal was listed for hearing on 06.10.2016, learned counsel for the appellant was absent and hence, the case was adjourned on 24.10.2016. Thereafter, when the case was listed on 24.10.2016 on that day also the counsel for the appellant was absent and there was no representation and hence, it was directed to be listed "For Dismissal" on 24.10.2016. Accordingly, the case was posted under the caption "For Dismissal".

2.Today also when the case was called the learned counsel for the appellant is absent and there was no representation which shows that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting this appeal further. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The Additional District Sessions Judge, Karaikal.

2.-Do- Thro The Principal Sessions Judge, Karaikal.

3.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Karaikal.

4.-Do-Thro The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Puducherry.

5.The Superintendent, Special Sub Jail, Karaikal.

6.The Inspector of Police, Karaikal Town Police Station, Karaikal.

7. The Additional Public Prosecutor Pondicherry.

CRL.A.No.329 of 2012 rj[co] srg 07/12/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/