B.Mutarasan, v. The Chief Educational Officer,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 03.01.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN Writ Petition No.16643 of 2016 B. Mutharasan ... Petitioner Vs.

1 The Chief Educational Officer, Chennai District, Chennai 2 Inspector of Matriculation Schools, DPI Complex, College Road, Chennai - 600 006 3 Private Schools Fee Determination Committee, DPI Complex, College Road, Chennai - 600 006 4 The Correspondent, Grace Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Chinna Kodungaiyur, Chennai - 600 118 ... Respondents Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the fourth respondent to collect the fees as fixed in the year 2012 till the disposal of the representation of the petitioner dated 20.07.2015 by the third respondent.

For Petitioner : Mr.M. Habeeb Rahman For R.1 to R.3 :

Mr.R. Vijayakumar AGP For R.4 : Mr.M. Venkadeshan

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the prayer in the writ petition does not survive and the writ petition has become infructuous.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.

Recording the same, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1 The Chief Educational Officer, Chennai District, Chennai 2 Inspector of Matriculation Schools, DPI Complex, College Road, Chennai - 600 006 3 Private Schools Fee Determination Committee, DPI Complex, College Road, Chennai - 600 006 +1cc to Mr.M.Venkadeshan, Advocate SR.No.371 +1cc to Government Pleader SR.No.655 W.P.No.16643/2016 GMR(CO) GN(29/01/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/