← Library
Madras High CourtWP/22121/2018disposed of

Mrs.J.Saraswathy, v. The Chairman,

2018-08-29Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 29.08.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.22121 of 2018 and W.M.P. No.24674 of 2018

1. Mrs.J.Saraswathy

2. Mrs.J.Vijayalakshmi .. Petitioners Vs The Chairman, Tamilnadu Slum Clearance Board, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai - 600 005.

.. Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to execute the sale deed of the property on payment situated at Plot No. 214 Door No. 4, N.S.K. Street, Annai Sathya Nagar, Ambattur, Chennai - 600 053 which was allotted to the petitioners' mother namely Late Mrs.Dhanalakshmi @ Mahalakshmi in favour of the 1st Petitioner namely Mrs.J.Saraswathy on the representation dated 06.06.2018.

For Petitioners: Mr.R.Balasubramanian For Respondent : Mr.M.RajaSekar

O R D E R

By consent of both parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2.The petitioners have come up with this writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent to execute the sale deed of the property on payment situated at Plot No. 214 Door No. 4, N.S.K. Street, Annai Sathya Nagar, Ambattur, Chennai - 600 053 which was allotted to their mother namely Late Mrs.Dhanalakshmi @ Mahalakshmi in favour of the 1st Petitioner namely Mrs.J.Saraswathy on their representation dated 06.06.2018.

3.According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the first petitioner has submitted a representation dated 06.06.2018 claiming the same relief as prayed in this writ petition, but, the said representation is yet to be disposed https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

of by the respondent. However, the learned counsel submitted that it would suffice, if the said representation made by the first petitioner is directed to be considered by the respondent, on merits.

4.Mr.M.Rajasekar, learned Standing Counsel taking notice for the respondent submitted that the respondent be directed to consider the first petitioner's representation and pass orders in accordance with law.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court directs the respondent to consider the first petitioner's representation dated 06.06.2018 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioners as well as any of the interested parties, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6.Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. Consequently, connected W.M.P. is closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS ) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vga To The Chairman, Tamilnadu Slum Clearance Board, Chennai - 600 005.

+1cc to Mr.M.RAJASEKAR , Advocate SR.No. 59514 +1cc to Mr.R.BALASUBRAMANIAN , Advocate SR.No. 59096 W.P.No.22121 of 2018 ASK(19/09/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/