← Library
Madras High CourtWP/18164/2015disposed of

National Maritime Academy v. Government Of India

2015-09-03Honourable Mr Justice M.M.Sundresh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 03.09.2015

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.P.No.18164 of 2015 & M.P.No.1 of 2015 1.National Maritime Academy Employees Union, Rep. by its General Secretary, Regd. No.2129/MDS, East Coast Road, Uthandi, Chennai-600 119.

2.G.Marimuthu .. Petitioners Vs.

1.The Government of India, Rep. by the Secretary, Ministry of Shipping, No.1, Sansad Marg, New Delhi-110 001.

2.Indian Maritime University, Rep. By its Registrar, Chennai Campus, East Coast Road, Uthandi, Chennai-600 119.

3.The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Rep. By its Branch Manager, B.R.Compex, No.28/29, Woods Road, Chennai-600 002.

.. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the second respondent University to renew the group insurance scheme for its employees from the date it got expired with the third respondent Insurance Company. For Petitioners ..

Mr.N.G.R.Prasad for M/s Row and Reddy For Respondents ..

No appearance for R1 & 3 Mr.K.R.Tamizhmani for R2

ORDER

The first petitioner is an Union of respondents 2 and 3. The petitioners have come forward with this writ petition with the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

grievance that the earlier Insurance policy has been diluted by the subsequent one.

2.

When the matter is taken up, the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent made a submission, which he wants this Court to record. The submission is to the effect that earlier the dependants of the employees are entitled equally out of the total amount of Rs.4,00,000/- under the Scheme. Prior to the said scheme, any one of the dependent would be given the total amount cumulatively. As the earlier scheme was introduced without proper authorisation, the subsequent one has been brought forth. However, considering the difficulties expressed, appropriate approval has been given to the earlier scheme, by which, one dependent of the family has become entitled to get Rs.4,00,000/- in a given factual situation as against the maximum of Rs.1,00,000/- each. Thus, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed since the original scheme which was challenged for a temporary period has been restored with effect from 31.03.2015 onwards. In view of the same, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition. 3.

Recording the said statement, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS IV ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar raa To 1.The Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Shipping, No.1, Sansad Marg, New Delhi-110 001.

2.The Registrar, Indian Maritime University, Chennai Campus,East Coast Road, Uthandi, Chennai-600 119.

3.The Branch Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., B.R.Compex, No.28/29, Woods Road, Chennai-600 002.

+1 cc to M/s.Row & Reddy, Advocates, sr.47857 W.P.No.18164 of 2015 sv co, kra 21/09 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/