← Library
Madras High CourtWP/11353/2025dismissed

J.Mohan Kumar v. The District Registrar

2025-04-01Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 01.04.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH J.Mohan Kumar .... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Registrar Chennai Central Chennai.

2.The Sub Registrar Adyar Sub Registrar Office Adyar, Chennai.

3.The Inspector of Police J-5, Sastri Nagar Police Station Besant Nagar, Chennai - 600 090.

4.A.Mohammed Nazar .... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent and second respondent to cancel the Partnership Deed and General Power of Attorney which was in favour of the fourth respondent herein and to direct the third respondent to take necessary action against the fourth respondent herein and to 1/5

pass an order based on the representation dated 25.01.2024, by considering the petitioner's representation within a time frame that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner :

Mr.R.Naresh Kumar For Respondents :

Mr.P.Harish Government Advocate [R1 & R2] Mr.V.Meganathan Government Advocate for R3

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the first and second respondent to cancel the partnership deed and general Power of Attorney presented by the fourth respondent, by considering the representation made by the petitioner on 25.01.2024.

2. Heard Mr. R.Naresh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.Harish, learned Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2, and Mr.V.Meganathan, learned Government Advocate for third respondent.

3. In the considered view of this Court, the first and second respondent are 2/5

not vested with any power to cancel the documents. That apart, there is absolutely no indication in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition as to when such partnership deed was presented for registration and when the Power of Attorney was presented for registration. Therefore, the entire relief sought in this writ petition is vague without sufficient particulars.

4. In view of the above, the relief sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted. This writ petition is dismissed accordingly. No costs. 01.04.2025 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order ds To:

1.The District Registrar Chennai Central Chennai.

2.The Sub Registrar Adyar Sub Registrar Office Adyar, Chennai.

3.The Inspector of Police J-5, Sastri Nagar Police Station 3/5

Besant Nagar, Chennai - 600 090.

4/5

N. ANAND VENKATESH., J ds 01.04.2025 5/5