← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/402/2016dismissed as infructuous

R.Inbaraj v. M.Velappan

2021-04-08Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira2 pages

CRP (NPD) Nos.402 & 403 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08.04.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRP (NPD) Nos.402 & 403 of 2016 R.INBARAJ, Son of Late Raja Sigamani Nadar ... Petitioner / Appellant in both CRPs Vs.

M.VELAPPAN, Propritor of 'Priya Sweets and Bakery'

...Respondent / Respondent in

both CRPs COMMON PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act of 1960 as amended by Act 23 of 1973 and Act I of 1980 seeking to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 23.04.2015 passed by the learned Appellate Rent Controller in R.C.A.Nos.217 & 219 of 2014 on the file of the IX Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai, conforming the Judgment and Decree of the learned Rent Controller in R.C.O.P.Nos.1856 & 1857 of 2007 on the file of the XVI Judge of the Small Causes Court, Chennai and allow this Civil Revision Petition. For Petitioner in both CRPs : Mr.R.Neelakandan ***** https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 1/2

CRP (NPD) Nos.402 & 403 of 2016 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA,J.

ssi C O M M O N O R D E R (This case has been heard through video conference) When the matter is taken up today, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in these Civil Revision Petitions has become infructuous.

2.Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, these Civil Revision Petitions stand dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

08.04.2021 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No ssi To 1.The IX Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai.

2.The XVI Judge of the Small Causes Court, Chennai. CRP (NPD) Nos.402 & 403 of 2016 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 2/2