Rajendran v. State By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Ninth day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.10108 of 2022 1 RAJENDRAN [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 KESAVAN 3 KUMAR Vs STATE BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, E3, MINJUR POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

(CRIME NO. 137/2022) For Petitioner : M/S. B.GOPALAKRISHNAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 147, 294(b), 323, 324 & 506(i) of IPC in Crime No. 137 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. This is the third anticipatory bail petition filed by this petitioner and this Court is of the opinion that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required, the respondent police is not able to secure the accused.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner insist for anticipatory bail to the petitioner on the ground that co-accused were granted bail.

4. However, considering the nature of the allegation and abscondance of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed. -sd/- 29/04/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, E3, MINJUR POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S. B.GOPALAKRISHNAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.10108/2022 Date :29/04/2022 CSK 09/05/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/