← Library
Madras High CourtCS/419/2011decreed

Sikora Salvador International v. M/S.Nanchil Latex Private Ltd.

2017-04-10Honourable Mr Justice T. Ravindran4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:10.04.2017

CORAM

THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN C.S.No.419 of 2011 Sikora Salvador International Limited, rep.by its Managing Director, Registered Office No.259/1, Bye-Pass Road, Poonamallee, Chennai-600 056.

.. Plaintiff vs.

1.M/s.Nanchil Latex Private Limited, rep.by its Director, Mr.S.Meganathan, No.69, New Avadi Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010.

2.M/s.Nanchil Infrastructure Private Limited, rep.by its Director, No.129 A, Anna Nagar East, ''D''-Block, Chennai-600 102.

3.M/s.Rajalakshmi Automobiles Private Limited, rep. by its Director,

No.69, New Avadi Road, Kilpauk, Chenani-600 010.

4.Mr.S.Meganathan, Promoter/Director, M/s.Nanchil Infrastructure Private Limited, No.129 A, Anna Nagar East, ''D''-Block, Chennai-600 102.

5.Mr.R.Vijayakumar .. Defendants Civil Suit filed under Order IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules 1956 read with Order VII Rule 1 CPC praying for the following judgment and decree against the defendants for the following reliefs:

a) for a sum of Rs.41,30,000/- together with further interest at 18% per annum on a sum of Rs.35,00,000/- from the date of the plaint, till the date of realization and (b) costs of the suit;

For Plaintiff :Mr.S.Babu For defendants :Set-exparte

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the plaintiff present. The

defendants have already been set ex-parte.

2.Thereafter, the matter was referred to learned Master for recording ex-parte evidence. After completion of recording of the ex-parte evidence, the matter is again posted before Court for further proceedings.

3.In support of the plaintiff's case, PW1 has been examined and the documents Exs.P1 to P13 have been marked. 4.The oral and documentary evidence produced on the side of the plaintiff remain uncontroverted, accordingly, on perusal of the same, it is found that the plaintiff has established its claim.

5. In the result, the suit is decreed as prayed for by the plaintiff with cost.

10.04.2017 Speaking/Non speaking Index: Yes/No

dn T.RAVINDRAN.J.

dn C.S.No.419 of 2011 10.04.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in