← Library
Madras High CourtWP/2378/2017disposed of

R.Rajendran,(Ppo No.Ro 317680) v. The Govt. Of Tamil Nadu,

2017-02-01Honourable Mr Justice M. Sathyanarayanan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 01.02.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN W.P.No.2378 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.2363 of 2017 1.R.Rajendran 2.T.Ramakrishnan 3.A.Muniasamy 4.S.Rajendran ... Petitioners Vs.

1. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Principal Secretary to Government, Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

2. The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Finance Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

3. The Commissioner of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015.

4. The District Collector (PD Section) Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of writ of Certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to paragraph 4(b) of G.O.Ms.No.77 Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department dated 12.07.2013 of the first respondent and quash the same in so far relates to not counting the services rendered by the petitioner in part time Panchayat clerk along with regular service for the purpose of pension and direct the respondents to count 50% services rendered in the post of part time panchayat clerk along with regular service for the purpose of granting pension.

For Petitioners : Mr.V.Suthakar For Respondents : Mr.K.Dhananjayan, Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal.

2. The service particulars of the petitioners are as follows:

S l .

N o .

Name Date of Appointmen t as part time Panchayat Clerk Date of joining as Junior Assistant Date of Retirement Designation 1 R.Rajendran 01.12.1982 27.03.1999 30.09.2016 Dy.BDO (Retd) Paramakudi BDO Office, Ramanathapu ram District.

2 T.Ramakrishnan 01.09.1981 25.01.1996 31.03.2015 Dy.BDO (Retd) BDO Office, Muthukalath ur, Ramanathapu ram District.

3 A.Muniasamy 12.01.1982 24.01.1996 31.03.2011 Assistant, (Retd), BDO office, Mandapam at Uchippulli Ramanathapu ram District.

4 S.Rajendran 01.09.1981 25.01.1996 30.09.2017 Dy. BDO, in working at BDO Office, Kadalady Ramanathapu ram District.

3. The grievance expressed by the petitioner is that the 4th respondent had granted pension to the petitioners 1 to 3 by calculating regular government service and refused to take 50% part time Panchayat service by applying G.O.Ms.No.77, Rural Development Department, dated 12.07.2013 and challenging

paragraph No.4(b) of the said Government Order, came forward to file this writ petition.

4. Mr.V.Suthakar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the said Government Order as well as the consequent proceedings were put to challenge in W.P.No.21397 of 2016 by one P.Sellavelu and others Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Principal Secretary to Government, Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009 and a single bench of this Court has taken note of the earlier judgment rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.431 of 2016 and passed a positive order to count 50% of the service put in by the petitioner therein by way of part time employment along with regular service for the purpose of commutation of pension and other benefits and prays for similar orders.

5. This Court heard the submission of Mr.K.Dhananjayan, learned Special Government Pleader, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

6. It is relevant to extract paragraph Nos.4 to 6 of the judgment dated 11.04.2016 in W.A.No.431 of 2016: "4. The State Government took a policy decision by G.O.Ms.No.39, Rural Development and Panchayat (E5) Department dated 13 June 2011, (for short "G.O. Ms.No.39") whereunder, it was clearly observed that an employee, working in Panchayat as Full Time Clerk or Part Time Clerk and having been absorbed by the Government prior to 01 April 2003, will be entitled to counting 50% of the service as part time employee under the consolidated pay for the purpose of computation of pensionary benefits.

Subsequently, the said Government Order, as pleaded by the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the appellants, was amended by G.O.Ms.No.77, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department dated 12 July 2013 (for short "G.O. Ms.No.77"), whereunder, counting of 50% of service in case of Part Time Clerks was withdrawn.

5. In the case on hand, indisputably, the respondents 1 and 2 were absorbed as Junior Assistant before 01 April 2003, subsequent to which the first respondent was promoted as Assistant and retired from service on 31 December 2009 and the second respondent retired as Cashier on 30 June 2007. Thus, the respondents 1 and 2 are entitled to the benefit as granted in G.O.Ms.No.39 and the subsequent Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.77, would not be

applicable to those employees, who were entitled to the benefit before issuance of the said Government Order.

6. The learned single Judge has rightly come to the conclusion that 50% of the service period put in by the respondents 1 and 2 under the consolidated pay by way of part time employment will be computed for pensionary benefits. We do not find any reason to take a view contrary to the one taken by the learned single Judge."

7. Though the petitioner prayed for a larger relief, this Court in the light of the above facts and circumstances and without going into the merits of the claim projected by the petitioner, permits the petitioner to submit a representation to the first respondent through proper channel within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the first respondent upon receipt of the said representation, is directed to consider the same in the light of the above cited judgment and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a further period of eight weeks thereafter and communicate the decision taken to the petitioners.

8. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vsm To

1. The Principal Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

2. The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Finance Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

3. The Commissioner of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015.

4. The District Collector (PD Section) Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

+1cc to Mr.V.Suthakar, Advocate, S.R.No.6322 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.6436 Writ Petition No.2378 of 2017 SV(CO) CA(27/02/2017)