Vijay v. State Rep. By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.04.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Vijay ... Petitioner Vs.
State rep. By The Inspector of Police, PEW - Pallikaranai Police Station, Chennai District.
(Crime No.79 of 2023).
... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending investigation in Crime No.79 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Bennington For Respondent : Mr.C.E.Pratap Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/6
O R D E R
The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to Judicial custody on 08.03.2023 for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 in connection with Crime No.79 of 2023, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution that the petitioner was found in possession of 3 Kgs of Ganja. Hence the complaint.
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case and he has been in judicial custody from 08.03.2023. He would submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.
4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the petitioner was in possession of 3 Kgs of 2/6
Ganja and he has got one previous case under NDPS Act. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.
5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent and perused the entire materials available on record.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to make a non refundable deposit of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen thousand only) to the credit of the Chair Person, Juvenile Justice Board, Kellys, Chennai, without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court, on such deposit and production of proof, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial 3/6
Magistrate No.II, Alandur and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 6.30 p.m. until further orders;
[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
13.04.2023 mfa 4/6
To
1. The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Alandur.
2. The Central Prison, Puzhal.
3. The Inspector of Police, PEW - Pallikaranai Police Station, Chennai District.
4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
5/6
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA.,J.
mfa 13.04.2023 6/6