Geetha v. State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police

1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 02.04.2025 THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

1. Geetha

2. Rabik Bai Saaruk @ Rabik Rahul

...Petitioners/Accused A4 & A6

Vs The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Poonamalle Police Station, Tiruvallur District.

(Crime No.1039 of 2024)

...Respondent/Complainant

For Petitioner (s):

Mr.S.Silambuselvan For Respondent(s):

Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate (Crl.Side) Page No.1 of 4

ORDER

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioners in Crl.O.P.No.2572 of 2025 dated 10.02.2025 that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police, every day at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioners have been complying with the condition regularly imposed by this Court.

3. Considering the submissions of both sides and the nature of the offence, the condition in paragraph no.7(c) imposed on the petitioners in Crl.O.P.No.2572 of 2025 dated 10.02.2025 is relaxed.

4. Accordingly, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. 02.04.2025 dk To Page No.2 of 4

1.The Inspector of Police, Poonamalle Police Station, Tiruvallur District.

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai - 600 104.

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

Page No.3 of 4

dk CRL MP NO.6448 of 2025 02.04.2025 Page No.4 of 4