Madras High CourtCS/683/2014decree in terms of memo of comprom

S.P.Rajah v. P.S.C. Raja

2016-04-25Honourable Mr Justice K.K. Sasidharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.4.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN Civil Suit No.683 of 2014 S.P.Rajah : Plaintiff versus

1. P.S.C.Raja

2. C.Rajeswari Chandrasekar : Respondents Suit filed for declaration that the agreement dated 02/10/2012 agreed upon between the plaintiff and 1st defendant is valid legal and binding on parties herein and other relief.

For Plaintiff : Mr.R.S.Raveendhren For Defendants : Mrs.V.Pushpa

J U D G M E N T

The plaintiff filed the suit in C.S.No.683 of 2014 for declaration that the agreement dated 2 October 2012, executed by him along with the first defendant is valid, legal and binding on both the parties and for a consequential injunction in respect of the suit property.

2. The defendants have entered appearance on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ receipt of summons. Thereafter, the parties have

compromised the matter.

3. The plaintiff and the defendants executed a joint memorandum of compromise dated 25 April 2016.

4. The Joint memorandum of compromise contain the terms and conditions of the settlement. The parties wanted a decree to be passed in terms of the joint memo of compromise.

5. The plaintiff and defendants are present in Court. The parties have confirmed the execution of the joint memorandum of compromise.

6. The suit is decreed in terms of the joint memorandum of compromise dated 25 April 2016. The memorandum of compromise shall form part of the decree. There is no order as to costs.

7. The plaintiff is entitled to refund of Court fee as per rules.

Sd/.K.K.S.J 25.04.2016 //Certified to be a true copy// Dated this the day of 2016 S.s/04.07.2016 COURT OFFICER From 25.09.2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Order/Judgment Decree in this format.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/